graveyard of politics

well care for a sleep again paklah???
The ‘sleeping administration’ of Prime Minister Badawi has been served its wake-up call. And this time it is the Malaysian public that is going to be making the demands on the state, and not vice-versa

On March 8, 2008, Malaysians went to the polls and voted in the country’s 12th general elections. The results, as they were announced over the very same evening and well into the next morning, sent shock waves across the country.

After being in power for more than half a century, the ruling National Front Coalition not only lost the vital two-thirds majority of seats in Parliament, but came close to losing its majority altogether. In the bargain, five state governments were lost, and the opposition coalition made up of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic party (PAS), the Democratic Action Party (DAP) and the People’s Justice Party (PKR) won more than 80 Parliamentary seats and control of five state assemblies.

The most remarkable thing about the election results on the day itself was the fact that they were hardly ever mentioned in the mainstream state-controlled media. As the results came pouring in, it was clear that there was about to be a massive swing to the opposition and that the administration of Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was in for a pounding.

Yet official commentators on TV and radio could only mumble inanities such as “we never knew the public were so disaffected”. How? Why?

This election was a clear and simple sign that the Malaysian public has grown thoroughly fed up and disillusioned by the empty promises of the Badawi government, that had won such an overwhelming mandate in 2004. Badawi came to power on a wave of electoral promises, ranging from institutional reform, the opening and freeing of the public domain, the settlement of outstanding cases of high-level corruption and abuse of power, greater transparency and accountability.

Yet after five dismal years, hardly any of these promises have been fulfilled and instead the Malaysian public were fed with broken promises, stunts and gimmicks that were better suited to a vaudeville opera instead.

While thousands of Malaysians continued to live below the poverty line and as prices and crime rates soared, the Badawi government sent a Malaysian astronaut as a space tourist on board a Russian spacecraft, just to break its own book of records.

While the poor Malay-Muslims of northern states such as Kelantan and Trengganu looked for sound economic development and equal distribution of wealth, Badawi’s government treated them to an Islamic civilisation theme park that cost 250 million ringgit (RM), complete with merry-go-round instead.

The real merry-go-round, however, was the Badawi establishment’s total failure to address key institutional, structural and socio-cultural issues that had irked and alienated so many Malaysians over the past four years: the non-Malay minorities have been demanding greater state protection of their collective identities after the spate of Hindu temple demolitions, denial of permits for building churches, seizure of Bibles, etc.

Yet in all these cases, when and where Badawi could have personally intervened, he did nothing and stood silent and indifferent, falling back on his worn-out mantra of being the ‘Prime Minister of all Malaysians’.

But surely the Prime Minister of all Malaysians would stand up for the rights of minorities, defend the plight of the poor and marginalised, listen to the demands and protests of the disaffected, and actually take corrective measures to do his job properly. Throughout 2006-2007 all the signs of a latent protest movement were there, with lawyers demonstrating for judicial reform, ordinary citizens calling for free and fair elections, and religious minorities begging to have their concerns addressed.

The Badawi administration’s reaction to these demands was to demonise protestors, set the police on civil society gatherings, refuse permits for public seminars, ban books deemed dangerous, and stifle freedom of press instead.

Thus it came to pass that an inward-looking administration cut off and isolated from its own public was finally served its notice last weekend. Throughout the campaign the opposition parties of PKR, DAP and PAS repeatedly used the now-iconic image of Prime Minister Badawi dozing off asleep during one of his UMNO party’s meetings, as an emblem of an administration that is cut off, unable to listen and unwilling to respond.

By the second week of the campaign it was clear that the momentum had developed and that the vote swing this time round would be as great as in 2004, though in the opposite direction.

The morning after, a shocked and dazed Badawi stood before the cameras and admitted that his administration had failed to take into account the demands of the public. But with a weakened government and a UMNO party that is unwilling and unable to correct itself, how can there possibly be any change to the Malaysian governmental system, save by voting UMNO and the National Front out of power at the next elections?

This much, however, is certain: The ‘sleeping administration’ of Prime Minister Badawi has been served its wake-up call. And this time it is the Malaysian public that is going to be making the demands on the state, and not vice-versa.
Well please on behalf of malays here please resign and don't be sleepy again!!

Malaysian Voters lastly are no longer afraid to support the opposition of Barisan Alternative of Malaysia

THERE was no grandstanding on tanks; no sea of banner-waving protesters in monochrome T-shirts; not even a change in the federal government. Yet Malaysia underwent a quiet revolution on March 8th. The political scene transformed itself overnight. That the change happened at the ballot box and not in the street makes it all the more cheering.

For 50 years since independence, Malaysia has been ruled by a coalition dominated by the United Malays National Organisation, or UMNO. Malaysia has prospered wonderfully, and the arrangement seemed immutable. Not any more. The governing coalition, the National Front, won the election for the federal parliament and eight of the 13 state assemblies easily enough (see article). But in a huge swing it lost the two-thirds majority in Parliament that it has enjoyed for 40 years, and which enabled it to change the constitution at will. In peninsular Malaysia (ie, excluding Malaysian Borneo), it actually—if narrowly—lost the popular vote. In five states, including the most populous, the opposition will form the government.

This is extremely good news for many reasons. The most basic is that democracies need a vibrant and credible opposition. Any party that stays in power for half a century is liable to show signs of complacency, arrogance and corruption, and UMNO is no exception. Abdullah Badawi won by a landslide in 2004, partly because of a promise to clean things up. Voters have turned against him not least because he is seen as having failed, or—worse—as not having even tried hard.

Second, the election result is a victory for hope over fear. At times the government has used harsh laws against opponents. Anwar Ibrahim, the leader of what is now the largest opposition party, and Lim Guan Eng, the new chief minister of the state of Penang, have done time in jail. More generally, the National Front has played on the fears evoked by the ghosts of 1969, when opposition advances at the polls were followed by bloody race riots. A vote for the opposition, went the none-too-subtle message, would risk bloodshed as the Malay majority took its revenge on the minorities. Yet it was not only many ethnic-Chinese voters (about a quarter of the population) and, especially, disgruntled ethnic Indians (about 8%) who deserted the National Front. Many Malays switched too.

That is a third reason for optimism: communal tension may not be the tinderbox that Malaysia has for so long assumed it to be. If so, the result may herald new thinking about the institutionalised racism of the pro-Malay affirmative-action policies introduced after 1969. The opposition parties campaigned on a platform of “colour-blind” affirmative action—help for those who need it, not for a particular ethnic group. In the past, that would have been deemed electoral suicide. Surely Malays would not vote against their own economic self-interest? In the event many seem to have recognised that the policy has become less a means for redistributing wealth to the disadvantaged than a vehicle for corruption and cronyism.
And now revolve even more, please

Of course, the opposition still has a long way to go. It is a loose coalition of ill-matched parties: a left-of-centre, mainly ethnic-Chinese one; an Islamist party that in the one state it has ruled since 1990 has banned unisex barbers and introduced single-sex tills in supermarkets; and Mr Anwar's multi-ethnic liberal reformers. They may make a mess of governing the states they have won, or prove as venal as those they have replaced. They have co-operated well in opposition: the Islamist party has moderated its demands, so as not to scare off the Chinese and Indian supporters of the other parties, and they made good tactical choices about who should contest which seat. But by the time of the next election, they will need to win votes as a potential government, rather than as a symbol of protest.

Or perhaps by then UMNO and the National Front will have reformed themselves. The first signs were good. Mr Badawi accepted the setback with grace. Opposition leaders avoided gloating and told their supporters not to celebrate in the streets lest they provide an excuse for troublemakers. Such maturity and restraint may not last. But in a region where competitive politics are so often feared because they are associated with instability, they offer a beacon of hope.

Keputusan Pilihan raya umum 2008 menyaksikan Barisan Nasional menerima kekalahan teruk. Tidak pernah dalam sejarah BN menerima kekalahan begitu besar iaitu hilang lima buah negeri dan hilang majoriti 2/3 di Parlimen.

Kekalahan ini sungguhpun mempunyai 1001 sebab, namun sebab-sebab utama jelas menjurus kepada kelemahan kepimpinan dan dasar Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Seperti kata Perdana Menteri Keempat Malaysia, Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, “Sekiranya kemenangan besar 2004 diuar-uarkan sebagai kemenangan Abdullah, maka Abdullah juga harus bertanggungjawab dalam kekalahan ini.”

Menurut kaji selidik laman web penyokong UMNO www.mykmu.net, antara punca utama kekalahan Barisan Nasional akibat secara langsung daripada Abdullah. 10 sebab utama ialah:

1. Kegagalan melaksanakan ekonomi secara makro bagi kesejahteraan masyarakat. Tiada hala tuju jelas ekonomi negara kecuali slogan dan Dalam tempoh empat tahun kepimpinan Abdullah telah berlaku:

a. Kenaikan harga petrol yang terlalu tinggi
b. Kenaikan tol yang sangat drastik,
c. Kenaikan kadar faedah asas (BLR),
d. kenaikan kos sara hidup - elektrik, cukai pintu dan air.
e. Kenaikan harga barang

2. Dasar Luar yang mengelirukan dan pro-Singapura seperti:

a. Mengakui Tambak Johor sebagai hak bersama Malaysia-Singapura tanpa kira sempadan, tanpa mendapat keputusan Mahkamah Antarabangsa.
b. Membatalkan pembinaan jambatan bengkok kerana ugutan Singapura
c. Masih gagal menyelesaikan isu harga air mentah ke Singapura
d. Gagal memimpin OIC

3. Promosi Islam Hadhari yang keterlaluan: a. Membimbangkan masyarakat bukan Islam.
b. Tidak diterima oleh sebahagian besar orang Islam di Malaysia kerana dianggap mengelirukan dan memberi imej tidak baik kepada Islam sebelum munculnya istilah Hadhari ini di Malaysia.

4. Pentadbiran negara yang tunggang langgang:

a. Tindakan menghantar Menteri ke negara China bagi memohon maaf atas isu ketuk ketampi bogel dalam lokap tanpa menyiasat terlebih dahulu identiti wanita terbabit.

b. membenarkan "media bashing" terhadap pasukan polis, cuba mewujudkan badan pemantau polis (IPCMC) tetapi menarik balik. Moral pasukan polis amat lemah sehingga menyebabkan Polis sudah kurang berkesan dan kadar jenayah kian bertambah tanpa penyelesaian.

c. Keputusan berubah-ubah dalam kes Jambatan Bengkok, Landasan Keretapi Berkembar, Jambatan Pulau Pinang Kedua menyebabkan negara kerugian berbilion ringgit

d. Kenyataan-kenyataan biadap dan tidak bertanggungjawab Abdullah seperti “I dont Know, i’m not involved” dalam kes ECM Libra dan memanggil pengkritik beliau sebagai Iblis.

e. Banyak menubuhkan suruhanjaya tanpa mengambil langkah sewajarnya menyebabkan suruhanjaya sendiri sudah menjadi lawak jenaka.

f. Pertelingkahan dan pertikaian antara Menteri sudah menjadi lumrah sehingga kabinet menjadi bahan jenaka masyarakat umum.

5. Pentadbiran yang kurang ajar dan biadap terhadap Perdana Menteri Keempat Malaysia, Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad menyebabkan ramai penyokong UMNO dan rakyat Malaysia berketurunan cina tidak berpuas hati dan melalukan undi protes.

6. Isu korupsi dan kronisme yang melampau dalam kes ECM Libra, Scomi dan Myteam menyebabkan hilang kepercayaan.

7. Memecah-belahkan UMNO

a. Membenarkan mereka yang dipersoal kesetiaan terhadap UMNO dan negara menguasai media yang UMNO mempunyai kepentingan telah menimbulkan keadaan tidak senang dalam UMNO.

b. Menggugurkan Ketua Bahagian dalam persempadanan semula kawasan pilihan raya lalu memberi isyarat jelas Abdullah tidak menghormati hak demokrasi parti.

c. Keputusan yang berbeza dalam isu politik wang antara Ahmad Zaki Zahid (Pembantu Khas Perdana Menteri) dengan Zaid Ibrahim yang menang tanpa bertanding mencerminkan penyalahgunaan Majlis Disiplin UMNO. Ahmad Zaki hanya diberi amaran kerana terbabit politik wang dalam pertandingan Ketua Pemuda UMNO Bahagian Putrajaya. Manakala Zaid Ibrahim digantung atas dakwaan politik wang sungguhpun tidak terbabit dalam sebarang pertandingan. Zaid menang tanpa bertanding Ketua UMNO Kota Bharu.

d. Tidak mengendahkan persepsi umum bahawa Khairy Jamaluddin begitu berkuasa dalam UMNO dan kerajaan. Malahan tindakan membenarkan Khairy menggunakan pengaruhnya dalam pertandingan Naib Ketua Pemuda UMNO menyebabkan beliau diejek (boo) selepas diumumkan menang tanpa bertanding. Keadaan ini dikukuhkan lagi dengan pemilihan Khairy sebagai calon Parlimen Rembau.

e. Tidak mengambil sebarang tindakan ke atas penyokong-penyokongnya seperti Datuk Kamarulzaman (TV3) dan Datuk Kalimullah (NSTP) menggunakan media mereka untuk menghentam pemimpin UMNO yang dilihat boleh memberi cabaran kepada Khairy Jamaluddin.

f. Hanya menurunkan peruntukan dan projek kepada kontraktor kelas F setelah menghadapi kritikan keras Tun Dr. Mahathir dan khuatir akan berlaku kritikan keras dalam perhimpunan agung UMNO. Rasuah terangan-terangan dengan mengumumkan peruntukan RM 3 juta setiap bahagian sehingga menjejaskan imej UMNO.

g. Kempen keterlaluan untuk mengalahkan Tun Dr. Mahathir dalam pemilihan perwakilan UMNO Kubang Pasu 2006 menyebabkan ramai ahli UMNO “berjauh hati.”

h. Membiarkan Setiausaha Agung UMNO, Datuk Seri Radzi Sheikh Ahmad yang tidak dipilih secara demokrasi dalam UMNO memporak- perandakan UMNO Perlis menjelang pilihan raya umum 2008.

8. Gagal mengawal isu Hindraf sehingga menjadi begitu besar dan MIC hilang sokongan orang India.

9. Tidak mempunyai strategi yang jelas apabila menerima kekalahan dalam pilihan raya umum 2008. Kata-kata seperti itu “pilihan rakyat”, “rakyat sudah buat keputusan, kita terima” bukanlah cerminan pemimpin yang mampu bangun memimpin BN untuk menang semula.

10. Akhir sekali, wajah kepimpinan Abdullah sudah ditolak oleh kaum Cina dan India serta tidak lagi disenangi oleh sebahagian besar orang Melayu dan UMNO. Isu ini bukan isu perebutan kepimpinan atau pertukaran pemimpin, tetapi ia merupakan isu dasar dan polisi Abdullah yang ditolak rakyat.

Justeru UMNO dan Barisan Nasional memerlukan kepimpinan baru bagi memberi nafas baru menjelang pilihan raya akan datang. Lebih penting, negara Malaysia memerlukan polis dan dasar baru yang lebih segar dan berwibawa bagi menjamin kemakmuran kepada rakyat.

Sehubungan itu, kami sebagai ahli-ahli UMNO dibawah dengan ini memohon agar:

1. Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi meletak jawatan secara sukarela sebagai Perdana Menteri dan Presiden UMNO.

ATAU

2. Sekiranya, Datuk Seri Abdullah dan Ahli Majlis Tertinggi UMNO berpendapat Presiden parti masih mendapat sokongan ahli UMNO, maka sewajarnya, satu Perhimpunan Agung Khas UMNO dipanggil dan satu undi sulit mengenai kedudukan Presiden UMNO diadakan.

Sekian, terima kasih.
sorry as it's in malay..
well to make it short this umno dude wants to be hero and make paklah PM of malaysia kiss his ass..
well a one in a thousand chance of Pak Lah quiting right?

Bahawa saya, Ab Jalil bin Aboo Backer, ahli UMNO bernombor 03030707 (semakan terakhir tiga tahun lalu) memohon agar Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi meletak jawatan secara terhormat sebelum Mesyuarat Agung Cawangan-cawangan UMNO yang akan akan datang.

Tidak perlu berselindung lagi bahawa kekalahan besar Barisan Nasional di lima negeri iaitu Kedah, Perak, Selangor, Pulau Pinang dan Kelantan adalah rentetan ketidakpuasan hati rakyat terhadap dasar ekonomi, pentadbiran dan pelaksanaan Islam Hadhari oleh pentadbiran Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Kekalahan di negeri-negeri pantai barat terutama di kawasan pengundi kaum cina membuktikan perjuangan laman ini dan ramai lagi ahli UMNO serta laman-laman web milik ahli atau penyokong UMNO dan Barisan Nasional sebelum ini.

Tindakan Abdullah menaikkan harga petrol secara keterlaluan, harga tol yang mendadak dan kenaikan kadar pinjaman asas telah menyebabkan rakyat di kawasan bandar mengalami kejutan inflasi yang bukan sedikit kesannya. Sungguhpun dirayu dan dipohon mempertimbangkan keadaan, pentadbiran Abdullah memilih untuk terus membuat dasar-dasar ekonomi yang tidak menguntungkan golongan peniaga kecil.

Tindakan memperkenalkan Islam Hadhari dan promosi berlebihan mungkin menarik perhatian penduduk pantai timur, namun di negeri-negeri yang komposisi kaumnya pelbagai agama ia menimbulkan perasaan kurang senang dan tidak puas hati di kalangan bukan Islam. Manakala di negeri seperti Kedah yang mempunyai banyak sekolah pondok dan kelas pengajian agama, Islam hadhari dianggap satu kecelaruan dari Islam sebenar.

Di Kedah juga ramai yang tidak berpuas hati dengan cara pentadbiran Abdullah dan akhbar-akhbar yang dikuasai oleh UMNO memperlekehkan Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad.

Di kalangan pemimpin akar umbi UMNO sendiri melihat bagaimana banyak projek-projek hanya dijalankan di bawah setelah kedudukan Pak Lah tergugat akibat diasak oeh Tun Dr. Mahathir. Mereka melihat jika Pak Lah menang besar sekali lagi, maka kebongkakan pentadbiran Pak Lah akan berterusan seperti yang berlaku selepas 2004.

Di sebalik cuba mentadbir negara dan membawa kemajuan, Pak Lah mahu menjadi pemimpin popular yang cuba memuaskan hati semua pihak terutama yang tidak menyokong Barisan Nasional. Hasilnya di kalangan penyokong UMNO dan BN merasa kecewa dan berpendapat mereka tidak penting.

Pak Lah juga banyak mengenepikan kepimpinan UMNO yang dipilih oleh perwakilan. Sebaiknya banya mendengar cakap penasihat-penasihatnya yang bukan pun pemimpin UMNO seperti Datuk Kalimulllah Hasan, Datuk Anuar Zaini, Datuk Kamarulzaman dan Khairy Jamaluddin. Ini menimbulkan perasaan tidak puas hati di kalangan pemimpin UMNO yang telah setia bersama UMNO ketika zaman jatuh dan bangun sejak 20 tahun lalu.

Tindaan Pak Lah memberi ruang terlalu ramai kepada sahabat-sahabat beliau bekas pemimpin semangat 46 seperti Radzi Sheikh Ahmad sehingga melebihi kuasa mereka yang setia bersama UMNO pada 1988 dan 1998 memberi banyak kesan sampingan. Ramai yang melihat Pak Lah yang mereka sokong dan dokong sebagai pengganti Dr. Mahathir telah mengkhianati mereka.

Krisis politik di Kubang Pasu, dan kemudiannya Perlis menyaksikan pengaruh terlalu besar Radzi Sheikh Ahmad dalam parti menyebabkan ramai akar umbi UMNO tidak berpuas hati. Lihat sahaja mengapa sehingga hari ini Datuk Seri Shahidan tidak diberi watikah untuk mneghadap Raja Perlis bagi membentuk kerajaan sungguhpun beliau berjaya menang besar dalam pilihan raya umum?

Dalaman UMNO juga tidak berpuas hati dengan tindakan Abdullah melucutkan jawatan Datuk Ibrahim Ali tanpa sebab disiplin yang jelas. Bagi pemimpin UMNO di bawah, jika Ibrahim Ali yang menang bertanding sebagai Ketua UMNO Pasir Mas pun boleh dibuang, apatah lagi pemimpin UMNO lain.

Dalam pentadbiran kerajaan, Pak Lah meruntuhkan kredebiliti sistem kehakiman, pasukan polis dan anggota pentadbiran kerajaan. Hasilnya banyak undi di kalangan kumpulan ini beralih kepada pembangkang kerana tidak berpuas hati dengan kepimpinan Pak Lah.

Pak Lah juga diingati kerana keputusan-keputusan yang berubah-ubah sehingga menimbulkan kemarahan ramai orang. Dari isu jambatan bengkok, penjualan aset khazanah Nasional, MV Augusta dan dasar pro Singapura sehinggalah tindakan Pak Lah menafikan akan membubarkan Parlimen pada 13 Februari lalu.

Ini menimbulkan kemarahan rakyat di Pantai Barat yang lebih banyak terdedah dengan laporan media internet. Mereka tidak melihat masa depan bersama pemimpin "flip flop" yang banyak dikatakan dikausai oleh anak-anak muda Tingkat 4, Jabatan Perdana Menteri.

Banyak lagi jika mahu ditulis kelemahan pentadbiran Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. Cukuplah sekadar sebahagian kenyataan ini untuk menyatakan bahawa Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi perlu meletak jawatan kerana dasar pentadbiran dan imej peribadi beliau sudah tidak lagi mendapat kepercayaan sebahagian besar rakyat.

Dalam pilihan raya umum kali ini, banyak wakil rakyat yang telah berkhidmat dengan cemerlang turut tumpas kerana masalah pentadbiran Abdullah. Wajarkah ramai lagi menjadi mangsa dalam pilihan raya akan datang?

Selagi Abdullah menjadi Perdana Menteri dan meneruskan dasar-dasar ekonomi semberono ini, publisiti keterlaluan terhadap Islam Hadhari dan penguasaan golongan tertentu di Jabatan Perdana Menteri, selagi itu rekod dan perkhidmatan wakil rakyat BN di kawasan bandar tidak akan memberi apa-apa erti.

Bahawa saya, Ab Jalil bin Aboo Backer, ahli UMNO bernombor 03030707 (semakan terakhir tiga tahun lalu) memohon agar Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi meletak jawatan secara terhormat sebelum Mesyuarat Agung Cawangan-cawangan UMNO yang akan akan datang.

Dalam pilihan raya kali ini pembangkang tidak pun bekerja keras kerana Abdullah telah memusnahkan UMNO dan BN selama empat tahun lalu.

Justeru saya sebagai ahli UMNO dengan ini memohon agar:

1. Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi meletak jawatan secara sukarela sebagai Perdana Menteri dan Presiden UMNO.

2. Sekiranya, Datuk Seri Abdullah dan Ahli Majlis Tertinggi UMNO berpendapat Presiden parti masih mendapat sokongan ahli, maka sewajarnya, satu Perhimpunan Agung Khas UMNO dipanggil dan satu undi sulit mengenai kedudukan Presiden UMNO diadakan.


well another letter of resignation from one UMNON member to paklah..well old dude you are outwitted!!

Nota: Petisyen ini disalin semula dari web MYKMU.NET (www.mykmu.net), rakyat Malaysia, ahli dan penyokong UMNO yang ingin turut serta menyatakan sokongan petisyen ini sila klik url di bawah.

Part 1...
Surat Terbuka Kepada Tan Sri Muhamad Muhd Taib(Letter to Taib.UMNO information head)

Oleh Ab Jalil Backer (jalil74@myjaring.net)

Assalamualaikum Tan Sri,

Pertamanya, izinkan saya mengucapkan jutaan syabas dan tahniah kepada Tan Sri. Setelah lebih tiga tahun dilantik sebagai Ketua Penerangan UMNO, baru minggu inilah tampaknya taring Ketua Penerangan UMNO Malaysia.

Tindakan membuat laporan polis ke atas laman web Malaysia-Today dan pengendalinya Raja Petra Kamaruddin atas tuduhan menghina Yang Di Pertuan Agong dan agama Islam wajar ditahniahkan.

Perkara ini amat signifikan kerana selama hari ini, banyak isu-isu sensitif yang dibincangkan secara terbuka oleh individu terkemuka tidak diambil sebarang tindakan oleh penerangan UMNO. Ini kita akan bincangkan kemudian.

Tan Sri,

Izinkan saya mengulas terlebih dahulu laporan polis ke atas Malaysia-today dan Raja Petra yang dibuat oleh Penerangan UMNO. Saya mengharapkan laporan polis yang dibuat oleh sebuah parti besar, yang saya ahlinya, tentulah mencerminkan sikap profesional dan bertanggungjawab.

Dilaporkan oleh media bahawa UMNO membuat laporan polis kerana terdapat komen-komen yang dikatakan menghina YDP Agong dan Islam dalam laman web Raja Petra.

Sekiranya Tan Sri dan mereka yang berada di Penerangan UMNO mahir dengan selok belok siber tentu faham bahawa komen yang dilakukan oleh pelayar atau pengunjung web adalah tanggungjawab pemberi komen.

Amatlah sukar untuk pengendali blog dan web menyaring hampir ke semua komen. Komen juga tidak pernah dianggap mewakili pandagan pemilik laman web.

Namun tentulah Tan Sri boleh berhujah bahawa adalah tanggungjawab penerbit laman untuk bertindak atau tutup sahaja laman tersebut jika tidak mampu mengawalnya. Baiklah. Kita katakan Raja Petra harus bertanggungjawab, demikian juga pemilik laman ini (mykmu.net).

Cuma jika Tan Sri berharap laporan tersebut akan menamatkan riwayat Raja Petra di alam siber hampir mustahil boleh berlaku. Apa yang Raja Petra perlu buat hanyalah memberi nombor-nombor Internet Protocol (IP) pemberi komen tersebut. Dan sudah banyak kes, pendakwaan hanya dilakukan ke atas mereka yang memberi komen bukannya pengendali laman.

Saya khuatir jika ini dilakukan, tidak mustahil terdapat ahli UMNO sendiri akan terperangkap. Bolehkah Tan Sri pastikan tiada sesiapa di kalangan pasukan siber yang UMNO bentuk ada menjalankan provokasi sedemikian? Malangnya, jika orang lain telah maju, pasukan siber UMNO belum lagi mampu menggunakan spoof atau menipu IP mereka.

Seterusnya Tan Sri, laporan ini, jika diperhalusi, lebih menguntungkan Raja Petra dan merugikan UMNO. Khalayak akan tertanya-tanya, mengapa sedemikian banyak tuduhan rasuah, salah guna kuasa dan campur tangan keluarga dalam pentadbiran negara tiada satu pun UMNO buat laporan. Sebaliknya sedemikian susah Tan Sri menerokai komen-komen pada setiap artikel yang tersiar hanya untuk membolehkan satu laporan polis dibuat.

Secara logik akalnya, tentulah artikel-artikel yang disiarkan oleh Raja Petra yang berunsur fitnah, khabar angin dan memburukkan pemimpin tertentu lebih wajar diambil tindakan berbanding komen-komen sampah di bahagian bawahnya.

Bila ini berlaku akan terdapat persepsi bahawa "tuduhan dan tulisan Raja Petra serta artikel yang tersiar dalam laman webnya memang benar dan sebab itu UMNO terpaksa mencari perkara-perkara kecil seperti komen pengunjung."

Memang benar saya akui bahawa persepsi ini belum tentu benar tapi impaknya besar.

Jika dahulu apa yang Raja Petra tulis belum tentu orang percaya, belum tentu diterima ramai kerana khalayak menganggap ini hanyalah sebahagian perang politik semata. Khalayak menganggap UMNO tidak berminat untuk berperang melalui undang-undang seperti mana Tun Dr. Mahathir tidak pernah menyaman sesiapa pun yang memfitnah atau memburukkannya.

Namun apabila terdapat ruang undang-undang sudah digunakan oleh UMNO maka akan timbul persepsi bahawa apa yang terdapat dalam Malaysia-Today tetapi tidak dilaporkan kepada polis itu benar.

Proses penaakulan minda khalayak akan membawa pertanyaan mengapa UMNO tidak membuat laporan Polis atau menyaman Raja Petra berikutan artikel-artikel beliau dalam The Corridors of Power?

Justeru saya tertanya-tanya. Apakah laporan polis tersebut dibuat untuk membantu UMNO dan kepimpinan negara atau sekadar menonjolkan kembali nama Tan Sri sebagai calon pilihan raya?

Tan Sri,

Laporan polis yang dibuat atas nama menghina YDP Agong dan Islam juga menimbulkan kembali tanda tanya kepada saya selaku ahli UMNO. Mengapa UMNO perlu membuat laporan polis ke atas laman web seperti Malaysia Today yang tidak besar impaknya kepada masyarakat Malaysia berbanding apa yang dilakukan oleh Kumpulan The New Straits Times suatu masa dahulu yang jelas menghina Islam. Sekiranya lupa Tan Sri boleh membaca kembali laporan Mykmu di sini.

Saya dan ramai ahli UMNO juga pasti tertanya-tanya jika Tan Sri menyeru kepada pemimpin UMNO supaya berani mempertahankan hak orang Melayu dan UMNO seperti dilaporkan Utusan hari ini, mengapa Tan Sri tidak bersuara walau sepatah haram pun bila Datuk Kalimullah Hassan (Ketua Pengarang NSTP ketika itu) menulis butiran perbincangan mesyuarat Penerangan UMNO Malaysia yang berada di bawah batang hidung Tan Sri?

Tan Sri,

Sebagai ahli UMNO tentulah saya tidak bersimpati dengan Raja Petra secara total. Namun saya fikir jika mahu menjatuhkan Raja Petra perlulah bertindak sebagai lelaki budiman (gentleman). Saman dan laporkanlah artikel-artikel beliau, bukannya menggunakan komen-komen yang entah dari mana dan tiada impak pun kepada khalayak.

Tan Sri,

Sebagai ahli UMNO juga saya merasa simpati kepada parti saya yang menjadi mangsa kerja-kerja tidak profesional pemimpin di PWTC.

Apabila mahu membuat laporan Polis tidak membawa bukti sebarang bukti menyokong laporan. Media massa dan yang dituduh pun keliru apa yang dilaporkan. Adakah Tansri mendapat nasihat peguam UMNO terlebih dahulu atau membuat laporan semberono sahaja?

Apabila mahu membantu UMNO di dalam Siber maka disiytiharkan seantero dunia penubuhannya, lalu jadilah semua pejuang siber UMNO "mati Katak" dicop pejuang berbayar.

Apabila mahu mengadakan pertemuan dengan bloggers UMNO dibatalkan kerana terdapat nama Datuk Ruhanie Ahmad dan Datuk Kadir Jasin. Apa salah UMNO berbaik dengan semua blogger yang bersimpati dengan UMNO biar pun tidak sependapat dalam polisi negara? Rugikah UMNO mempunyai ramai sahabat dan kawan?

Sebagai ahli politik kita jangan marah-marah. Tidak salah mendengar pandangan yang di bawah dengan senyuman manis biar pun pahit. Tidak semestinya semua pendapat yang kita anggap buruk perlu diherdik.

Sekian sahaja catatan ini Tan Sri. Bukan niat memalukan tapi sekadar menyatakan untuk kebaikan bersama. Apa yang saya tulis mungkin baik bagi saya tapi tidak bagi UMNO. Terserahlah kepada Tan Sri untuk menilainya.

Sekiranya terkasar bahasa tersalah bicara mohon dimaafkan.


you know what?this is crazy UMNO members asking their letters to resign.well only part 1.
i am too lazy to translate it.will do later

A GROUNDSWELL of discontent among Chinese voters sent MCA and Gerakan packing in many seats in this election.
Political analysts estimated the swing to be significant, by about 20 per cent, leading to the fall of the Gerakan-led Penang government.

The two members of the Barisan Nasional lost their seats mainly to the DAP, which registered one of its most impressive performances in the history of the country's elections.

Among the big name casualties from Gerakan were its acting president, Tan Sri Koh Tsu Koon, who lost in Batu Kawan, and Datuk Seri Chia Kwang Chye, who lost Bukit Bendera to DAP's Liew Chin Tong.

MCA's Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun and Petaling Jaya Utara incumbent was unseated by DAP's Tony Pua and Kota Melaka incumbent Wong Nai Chee by DAP's Sim Tong Him.
The swing was evident, going by the massive majorities garnered by DAP candidates. Seputeh incumbent Teresa Kok swept to victory with an unprecedented 36,564 majority compared with 12,895 in 2004. In Cheras, incumbent Tan Kok Wai won with a 28,300 majority compared with 11,861 in the last election.

As predicted by surveys and political commentaries in the days preceding the polls, unhappiness among Chinese voters translated into protest votes against the ruling coalition.

The seats where the Chinese formed the majority all went to DAP, except for a handful like Kulai and Kampar.

The second-largest community in the country was unhappy over several issues, notably the crime rate, hike in the price of goods, and what they perceived as the government's undelivered promises in efforts to combat corruption.

There was also uneasiness among the Chinese over several racial-religious issues that cropped up over the past year.

Usually inscrutable, Chinese voters this time around were not bashful about revealing which party they intended to "cross" on their ballot papers. They had also been vocal at opposition ceramah, turning up in thousands to cheer on the speakers.

"This was quite a departure as opposition ceramah in urban Chinese-majority areas usually do not attract such crowds," a political observer noted.

Last month, a poll by opinion research firm Merdeka Center revealed that only 30 per cent of Chinese were satisfied with the way the government was managing the economy, compared with Malays at 70 per cent and Indians, 35 per cent.

The Chinese felt the most important problem in the country was the price hike and rising cost of living, followed by crime and public safety, ethnic and racial inequality, and other economic problems.

But even then, MCA and Gerakan's huge losses were unexpected. Observers attributed this to the "silent majority".

Political analyst Ong Kian Ming opined that Chinese support tended to swing the most in Chinese majority seats because this was where they had a "security blanket" mentality, in that they did not feel that they needed to be protected from the Malays, unlike in more mixed constituencies.

He noted that it was also in these constituencies that the strongest DAP candidates were fielded and the Chinese minority sentiment played up.

What's the next step for the MCA and Gerakan?

Ong said they would need to listen more to the people, go to the ground and pay heed to what their constituents have to say. "I don't think there is any way for them to find a positive spin to the outcome of the election."

The other challenge for the non-Malay component parties is to find a balance between dealing with sensitive issues and remaining credible at the same time.

By tradition, MCA, for instance, prefers to shun the limelight when resolving sensitive subjects, ranging from Chinese schools to the award of government contracts to cultural flashpoints.

But this buttoned up image - which even its "Working quietly, and effectively, for results" campaign advertisements acknowledged - resulted in it being viewed as not doing anything to address issues affecting the Chinese community. Something the opposition exploited to the fullest during campaigning.

Being perceived as not doing anything can be fatal, since much of politics relies on perception.

The pressure will now be felt for the party to be seen to be more vocal. Unless the MCA is perceived to be more responsive to the community's sentiments, it risks alienating the Chinese even further.
Share

KUALA LUMPUR: Barisan Nasional secured only three out of the 13 parliamentary seats in Federal Territories; Putrajaya, Labuan and Setiawangsa.
The biggest upset was the defeat of Women, Family and Community Development Minister Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil in Lembah Pantai to newcomer, PKR's Nurul Izzah Anwar.

Nurul Izzah polled 21,728 votes and Shahrizat polled 18,833 votes.

Shahrizat was composed even though the official results were not announced. She said: "I am not disappointed. I am happy because the past 12 years I was here, a lot of changes were made and Lembah Pantai is no longer a sleepy hollow."

Federal Territory Minister Datuk Seri Zulhasnan Rafique beat PKR's Ibrahim Yaacob, the son of KL's first mayor, by a 8,134 vote majority in Setiawangsa. Zulhasnan who has been pushing for better housing for the poor and lower income group said he was surprised with the outcome and will do a post-mortem on the results.
Labuan's new candidate Datuk Yusoff Mahal beat Pas' Matsusin Abdul Rahman and independent candidate Lau Seng Kiat with 8,457 votes while Tourism Minister Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor garnered a 2,734-vote majority over Pas' Mohammad Nor Mohammad in Putrajaya. The government administrative centre has 5,079 registered voters.

Pas captured the BN's stronghold of Titiwangsa. Dr Lo' Lo' Ghazali won the seat against BN's Datuk Aziz Jamaluddin Md Tahir with a 1,972 vote majority.

PKR secured four seats in the Federal Territories; Bandar Tun Razak, Batu, Wangsa Maju and Lembah Pantai.

It was a surprising moment for veteran politician Datuk Tan Chai Ho when the results were announced in Bandar Tun Razak.

Tan lost to PKR's Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim by a majority of 2,515. Reports on the ground said the Malay and Chinese voters swayed towards the opposition at the last minute. The constituency has Malays (52.7 per cent), Chinese (39.5 per cent), Indians (7.2 per cent) and others (0.1 per cent).

Batu's Lim Si Pin, the son of veteran politician Datuk Seri Lim Keng Yaik, was in disbelief when the results were announced.

He lost to PKR's Chua Tian Chang, better known as Tian Chua, with a 9,455-vote majority. Tian Chua was surprised by his victory.

Another surprise was in Wangsa Maju where Wee Choo Keong, contesting under a PKR ticket, defeated Gerakan's Datuk Yew Teong Look.

DAP retained Seputeh, Kepong, Cheras and Bukit Bintang and added Segambut to its list. Segambut had been a Gerakan stronghold over the past three elections. However, Gerakan's Mah Woei Chye lost to Lim Lip Eng from DAP.

DAP's "Iron Lady", Teresa Kok, retained Seputeh parliamentary seat with the highest majority of 36,492 against BN's Carol Chew Chee Lin. She said it was not a personal victory but a victory by her team who helped serve the constituents for the past five years.

Kok believed Seputeh residents voted her in because they thought it was important to have a strong opposition as a check and balance.

In Kepong, DAP's Dr Tan Seng Giaw, who won with a majority of 23,848 for the sixth term over Gerakan's new comer Lau Hoi Keong pledged: "I will do more for the people, especially with regard to local issues because they involve public funds."

DAP also managed to retain Bukit Bintang, defeating a well known politician Datuk Dr Lee Chong Meng despite the 5,000 postal votes.

Even though Dr Lee was confident over his victory, but national sentiments such as fuel hike and other universal issues won sentiments of voters and he lost with 14,277 majority.

In Cheras, DAP's Tan Kok Wai won the seat for the fifth term from MCA's Jeffrey Goh Sim Ik who was earlier said to be making inroads with his grassroots support in the constituency. He won by 28,300 votes.

BN had won nine seats in the last elections. BN and the opposition are still in shock over the unexpected results.

The coalitionwas also stung with the defeat of MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu in Sungai Siput and PPP president Datuk M. Kayveas in Taiping.

Samy Vellu lost to Dr D. Jeyakumar, who contested under the Parti Keadilan Rakyat banner, by more than 1,800 votes, while Kayveas was defeated by the DAP’s Nga Kor Ming with a 11,298 vote majority.

With the exception of Umno, the majority of MCA, MIC, PPP and Gerakan candidates were also beaten by DAP candidates.

The BN failed to wrest the Ipoh Barat parliamentary seat and lost several state seats to the opposition.
In the 2004 general election, the coalition lost the Ipoh Barat, Ipoh Timor and, Batu Gajah parliamentary seats, and the Pasir Pinji, Jelapang, Menglembu, Pantai Remis, Keranji and Sitiawan state seats to the DAP.

At press time, MCA candidates were said to be hard hit in several urban Chinese-dominated seats and lost the Kepayang, Bercham, Buntong, Tebing Tinggi and Pasir Pinji state seats to the DAP.

The Pokok Assam state seat is also said to have been lost. The MCA won four parliamentary and 10 state seats in 2004.

For Gerakan, its biggest single casualty was state chairman Datuk Chang Ko Youn’s defeat by DAP candidate Ngeh Koo Ham in Beruas with a majority of about 1,500 votes.

The party’s Youth chief Datuk Mah Siew Keong was also reported to have been defeated in the Teluk Intan parliamentary seat by another DAP candidate, M. Manogaran.

As expected, the MIC candidate for Pasir Panjang, Datuk Dr S. Vasan, lost to Pas candidate Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin. For the Sungkai state seat, MIC vice-president Datuk S. Veerasingam lost to N. Sivanesan of DAP by 1,454 votes.

MCA secretary-general Datuk Ong Ka Chuan won in Tanjung Malim by a 5,422-vote majority against Mohamad Azman Marjohan of PKR.

It appears the DAP has strengthened its position in Perak from the previous three parliamentary and seven state seats to a minimum of six and 12 respectively.

As for Umno, the feeling on the ground is that the majority of its candidates will make it despite much-reduced majorities.

In 2004, Umno won in all 34 state seats it contested while the BN won 52 of the 59 state seats and 21 of the 24 parliamentary seats.

The state BN needs to win 39 state seats to form a two-thirds majority and 30 state seats for a simple majority.

Selangor has fallen into opposition hands following the loss of at least 35 states seats out of 56. Parti keadilan Rakyat is expected to announce its secretary general Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim, as the new Selangor Menteri Besar.
The unofficial results so far has PKR winning 11 out of the 20 seats it contested, with DAP winning all 15 seats contested while PAS won nine out of the 20 seats contested.

The results are considered a political tsunami as no one expected a loss of this magnitude for BN.

Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo was clearly shock at the election outcome and was halted up in a meeting room, at the UMNO state building, for most of the night.

He was seen leaving the building, without speaking to the Press, at 1.40am, for PWTC, where he is meeting the Prime Minister.
Many opposition candidates who won their seats were equally surprised and stunned at the results.

To opposition needed just 29 seats to from the state Government with a simple majority. With 35 seats the opposition is just short of three seats to win a 2/3 majority.

Among the state seats which fell to the opposition are Ijok, Kinrara, Meru, Sungai Pinang, Kota Alam Shah, Sri Andalas, Bukit Gasing, Port Klang, Pandamaran, Ulu Kelang, Bukit Gasing, Port Klang,Bukit Melawati, Jeram, Bukit Antarabangsa, Sri Muda, Kota Anggerik and Batu Tiga.

Datuk Zakaria Md Deros daughter-in-law Roslinda Abdul Jamil, who was BN’s candidate for Port Klang, was defeated by PKR’s Badrul Hisham Abduallh by 4,407 votes.

Independent Nazir Mansor received only 508 votes and lost his deposit.
Meanwhile Mohd Khir retained his Sungai Panjang state stat with a majority of more then 5,000 votes.

At least eight Parliament seats have also fallen into opposition hands, they are Gombak, Kota Raja, Puchong , Petaling Jaya Utara, Subang, Klang, Kapar and Kuala Selangor.

Tanjung Karang incumbent Datuk Noh Omar retained his seat with a majority of 3,000 votes.

The opposition looks set to form the next State Government in Perak after unofficial reports showed they won 30 state seats to the BN’s 29 to grab the simple majority in was the closest fight among the states.
While Umno suffered major setbacks in the party's traditional strongholds , the majority of MCA, MIC, PPP and Gerakan candidates were also wiped out by DAP candidates, a repeat of the 2004 nightmare for MCA as the party failed to wrest the Ipoh Barat parliamentary seat and lost several state seats to the opposition.

The party fared badly last time around when the Ipoh Barat, Ipoh Timor and, Batu Gajah parliamentary seats, and the Pasir Pinji, Jelapang, Menglembu, Pantai Remis, Keranji and Sitiawan state seats went to the DAP. MCA candidates were hard hit in urban Chinese-dominated seats and lost the Kepayang, Bercham, Buntong, Tebing Tinggi and Pasir Pinji state seats to the DAP.

The party was said to have also lost the Pokok Assam state seat. It won four parliamentary and 10 state seats in the 2004 elections. For Gerakan, its biggest single casualty was when state chairman Datuk Chang Ko Youn was defeated by DAP candidate Ngeh Koo Ham in Beruas with a majority of about 1, 500 votes.

The party's Youth chief Datuk Mah Siew Keong was also reported to have been defeated for the Teluk Intan parliamentary seat by another DAP candidate M. Manogaran. As expected, MIC candidate for Pasir Panjang Datuk Dr S. Vasan lost to Pas candidate Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin. It looks like the DAP has managed to strengthen its position in Perak from the previous three parliamentary and seven state seats to a minimum of six and 12 respectively.
As for Umno, the initial feeling on the ground is that the majority of its candidates will make it despite with a much-reduced vote majority this time around. Unconfirmed reports, however, have listed out several unexpected casualties, including the Lubuk Merbau state seat but nobody from the party has come forth with an official statement.

Back in 2004, Umno won in all 34 state seats it contested in while the coalition won 52 of the 59 state seats and 21 of the 24 parliamentary seats. Perak Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Mohd Tajol Rosli Ghazali has yet to address or make an official announcement to the large crowd gathered at his official residence.

BN was also shocked with losses of several bigwigs - MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu in Sungai Siput and PPP president Datuk M. Kayveas in Taiping. Samy Vellu was reported to have lost to Dr D. Jeyakumar by a majority of 1,821 votes while Kayveas was defeated by DAP's Nga Kor Ming with a majority of 11,298 votes.

BN wins federal govt but opposition takes five states

The Barisan Nasional will form the next Government as it has won more than half the parliamentary seats.

However, the coalition suffered some of the greatest defeats in its history. Barisan Nasional chairman Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, in accepting the results, said this was clear proof of democracy at work in the country.

Among the results yesterday were:

* The Barisan lost Kedah, Penang, Perak and Selangor,
* PAS strengthened grip on Kelantan,
* Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and Datuk Seri Ong Ka Ting won in their seats,
* Among ministers who lost their seats were Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu, Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, Datuk Seri Zainuddin Maidin,
* Gerakan acting president Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon lost to Dr P. Ramasamy in the Batu Kawan parliamentary seat.

Meanwhile, party leaders urged for calm and police have banned all victory celebrations.


here's some hottest seats results
Hot Seats
P3 Arau Ismail Kassim (Umno) vs Dr Harun Din (PAS) Harun loses
P5 Jerlun Mukhriz Mahathir (Umno) vs Idris Ahmad (PAS)
Mukhriz wins
P7 Palang Terap Ghazali Ibrahim (Umno) vs Mohd Nasir Zakaria (PAS)
PAS wins
P8 Pokok Sena Mahfuz Omar (PAS) vs Abdul Rahman Ibrahim (Umno) Mahfuz wins
P11 Pendang Dr Mohd Hayati Othman (PAS) vs Md Rozai Shafian (Umno) PAS wins
P15 Sungai Petani Zainuddin Maidin (Umno) vs Johari Abdul (PKR) PKR wins
P25 Bachok Nasharuddin Mat Isa (PAS) vs Dr Awang Adek Hussin (Umno) PAS wins
P36 K.Terengganu Razali Ismail (Umno) vs Mohamad Sabu (PAS) UMNO wins
P37 Marang Abdul Hadi Awang (PAS) vs Dr Ahmad Ramzi Mohamad Zubir (Umno) PAS wins
P41 Kepala Batas Abdullah Ahmad Badawi (Umno) vs Subri Mat Arshad (PAS) Pak Lah by 11,000
P43 Bagan Lim Guan Eng (DAP) vs Song Choy Leng (MCA) DAP wins
P44 Permatang Pauh
Wan Azizah Wan Ismail (PKR) vs Pirdaus Ismail (Umno) PKR wins
P46 Batu Kawan Dr Koh Tsu Koon (Gerakan) vs Dr P. Ramasamy (DAP) DAP wins by 3,000
P48 Bukit Bendera Chia Kwang Chye (Gerakan) vs Liew Chin Tong (DAP) DAP wins
P50 Jelutong Jeff Ooi Chuan Aun (DAP) vs Dr Thor Teong Ghee (Gerakan) DAP wins
P51 Bukit Gelugor Karpal Singh (DAP) vs Koay Har Huah (MCA) DAP wins
P57 Parit Buntar Abdul Raman Sulaiman (Umno) vs Dr. Mujahid Yusof (PAS) PAS wins
P60 Taiping M Kayveas (PPP) vs Nga Kor Ming (DAP) DAP wins
P62 Sungai Siput S Samy Vellu (BN_MIC) vs Dr Michael Jeyakumar (PKR) PKR wins
P64 Ipoh Timur Lim Kit Siang (DAP) vs Liew Mun Hon (MCA) Kit Siang wins
P65 Ipoh Barat M. Kulasegaran (DAP) vs Yik Phooi Hong (MCA) DAP wins
P66 Batu Gajah Fong Po Kuan (DAP) vs Cheah Yoke Can (MCA) Fong wins
P68 Beruas Chang Ko Youn (Gerakan) vs Ngeh Koo Ham (DAP) Gerakan wins
P71 Gopeng Ling Hee Leong (MCA) vs Lee Boon Chye (PKR) PKR wins
P76 Telok Intan Mah Siew Keong (Gerakan) vs M. Manogaran (DAP) DAP wins
P77 Tanjong Malim Ong Ka Chuan (MCA) vs Mohamad Azman Marjohan (PKR) Ong wins
P85 Pekan Mohd Najib Tun Razak vs Khairul Anuar Ahmad Zainudin (PKR) Umno wins by 26,000
P98 Gombak Said Anuar Said Ahmad (Umno) vs Mohamed Azmin Ali (PKR) PKR leading
P100 Pandan Ong Tee Keat (MCA) vs Syed Shahir Syed Mohamad (PKR) MCA wins
P103 Puchong Gobind Singh (DAP) vs Lau Yeng Peng (MCA) DAP wins
P106 Petaling Jaya Utara Chew Mei Fun (MCA) vs Tony Pua (DAP) DAP wins by 19,000
P107 Subang R Sivarasa (PKR) vs S. Murugesan (MIC) PKR wins by 8,000
P109 Kapar P Komala Devi (MIC) vs S Manikavasagam (PKR)

PKR wins
P110 Klang Charles Santiago (DAP) vs Ch'ng Toh Eng (MCA) DAP wins by 16,975
P115 Batu Tian Chua (PKR) vs Lim Si Pin (Gerakan) PKR wins
P120 Bukit Bintang Fong Kui Lun (DAP) vs Lee Chong Meng (MCA) DAP wins by 3,000
P121 Lembah Pantai Shahrizat Abdul Jalil (Umno) vs Nurul Izzah Anwar (PKR) Izzah wins
P122 Seputeh Teresa Kok (DAP) vs Carol Chew (MCA) DAP wins 36,000
P124 Bandar Tun Razak Tan Chai Ho (MCA) vs Abdul Khalid Ibrahim (PKR) Khalid wins
P130 Rasah Dr Yeow Chai Thiam (MCA) vs Loke Siew Fook (DAP)
DAP wins
P131 Rembau Khairy Jamaluddin (Umno) vs Badrul Hisham Shahrin (PKR) Umno wins
P138 Kota Melaka Wong Nai Chee (MCA) vs Sim Tong Him (DAP)
DAP wins


well give your comments.
anyway blogger Jeff Oii is heading to parliment!